Jul 17, In general, the belief that the Americans had a doctrine of “tank destroyers fight tanks, tanks fight infantry” is overstated. Tank destroyers were certainly not aggressive units which were supposed to go out and hunt for enemy tanks, they were supposed to be highly mobile reserves, which would be positioned at high levels for allied commanders. When an enemy armored attack and breakthrough materialized, they would be able to rapidly rush to the scene of the attack, and defeat it. This made a lot of sense given what had happened in the Battle of France, when fast moving German armored spearheads had penetrated through the French lines, and the French had a lack of sufficient highly mobile armored reserves to counter them. Of course, this scenario never happened except in some scenarios in Africa, but we had just seen the worst case scenario of what could have happened, and the tank destroyer branch showed that the Army was thinking carefully about how to answer it. What it was not was that the Americans thought that their tanks would only fight infantry and their tank destroyers would only fight tanks. There is no mention of it in the American doctrines. American tanks would fight against enemy tanks, as well as enemy infantry and other targets. There were elements where tank destroyers were geared more to the armor role, such as in getting more HVAP ammunition, but they were designed to fight tanks specifically after all – that doesn’t mean that regular tanks weren’t supposed to do so as well. Tank destroyers also did receive more anti-tank training.
Sherman Tank Myths
Authored by Dan Alex. The Sherman proved a relatively inexpensive, easy-to-maintain and – perhaps most importantly – an easy-to-produce combat system that more or less won the ground war for the Allies through sheer numbers. Similar to production efforts on the part of the Soviet Union with their T tank system, the M4 Sherman was the same class of tank weapon under an American guise. Despite her reach, it was outclassed in the important combat-related categories when coming up against the later-stage German Panzer tanks.
Kit Number Primary Media parts ( parts in grey styrene, 49 etched brass, 22 clear styrene, 2 DS plastic track runs, 1 twisted steel wire) Pros First “straight Sherman” kit from DML; new parts provide lots of options, as well as more “mix and match” bits for the true.
Chrysler helps build the arsenal of democracy: Setting the stage Also see: Abrams M-1 Tanks Try to picture in your mind a world where there was no personal computer with its related internet. There was almost no television. Many businesses and homes had a telephone, but even those were by no means widespread, and working-class or rural people rarely had one. Facsimile machines were relatively new, and their cost restricted them to large organizations such as newspapers in major cities, or the United States military, which acquired fax machines in the war budgets in News largely traveled via telegram and teletype.
Newspapers were slower; type was set in lead, pictures required multiple steps to set them in a plate that could be run on a printing press real presses, not fast offset units. Most newspaper stories were at least a day old when the paper came out. Radio was not that old, but it had sprung up quickly. Only a few places, like stores, kept the radio on all the time; they used a great deal of power and the tubes had limited lifespans. Most families set aside a time at night to listen to the radio as a group.
July 03, , The reality is that a “whole logistic train” gets created when and if required to support a piece of equipment when its required by the military to do a job. It’s not as if it wouldn’t be the first time the US Army had adopted a foreign piece of equipment, if they thought they needed it.
The Type 3 Chi-Nu (In Kanji, 三式中戦車 チヌ, “San-Shiki Chū-Sensha Chi-Nu”) was a Japanese medium tank, built as a stopgap solution to match the American M4 Sherman medium tank during the planned Invasion of Japan. It never saw actual combat. It first appeared in the anime in Episode
It is an opportunity for us to reflect on the language and ideas that represented each year. So, take a stroll down memory lane to remember all of our past Word of the Year selections. Change It wasn’t trendy , funny, nor was it coined on Twitter , but we thought change told a real story about how our users defined Unlike in , change was no longer a campaign slogan. But, the term still held a lot of weight.
Here’s an excerpt from our Word of the Year announcement in
M-4 Sherman Medium Tank
Enables Engineers to plant high-explosive charges on buildings and bridges. Costs manpower and 30 fuel. Barracks Edit Barracks on the field The first tier base structure. Provides deployment of Riflemen Squads and Reconnaissance jeeps. Also houses the necessary equipment to upgrade Riflemen on the field.
The M4 Improved is an American tier 5 premium medium tank. A variant of the M4 medium tank with angled hull and turret armor. It was developed by the Detroit Arsenal in August
SHARE Although studying creativity is considered a legitimate scientific discipline nowadays, it is still a very young one. In the early s, a psychologist named J. Guilford was one of the first academic researchers who dared to conduct a study of creativity. He challenged research subjects to connect all nine dots using just four straight lines without lifting their pencils from the page.
Today many people are familiar with this puzzle and its solution. In the s, however, very few were even aware of its existence, even though it had been around for almost a century. If you have tried solving this puzzle, you can confirm that your first attempts usually involve sketching lines inside the imaginary square. The correct solution, however, requires you to draw lines that extend beyond the area defined by the dots. Only 20 percent managed to break out of the illusory confinement and continue their lines in the white space surrounding the dots.
The symmetry, the beautiful simplicity of the solution, and the fact that 80 percent of the participants were effectively blinded by the boundaries of the square led Guilford and the readers of his books to leap to the sweeping conclusion that creativity requires you to go outside the box. The idea went viral via s-era media and word of mouth, of course.
Overnight, it seemed that creativity gurus everywhere were teaching managers how to think outside the box.
It was also distributed to the Allies via lend-lease. It was used from to , seen action both on east and western front. Evolved from previous medium and light tanks, it was the first American medium tank with the main gun mounted on a fully traversing turret, unlike the older tanks, which has a 37mm gun turret and a 75mm gun attached at the front side of the tank. Over 50, Shermans are built during the WW2.
The definitive Sherman, M4A1, one of the most well recognized iconic tanks of all time. The Sherman Firefly, with 76mm gun. The M4 Sherman, formally Medium Tank, M4, was the primary tank used by the United States during World War II.
Development[ edit ] The M26 was the culmination of a series of medium tank prototypes that began with the T20 in and was a significant design departure from the previous line of U. Army tanks that had ended with the M4 Sherman. Several design features were tested in the prototypes. Some of these were experimental dead-ends, but many become permanent characteristics of subsequent U.
Army’s first operational “heavy” tank. These tanks all had rear-mounted Continental air-cooled radial aircraft engines and a front sprocket drive. This layout required a driveshaft to pass under the turret, which increased the overall height of the tank, a characteristic shared with German tanks of World War II that also used this layout.
These features accounted for the high silhouette and large side sponsons that were characteristic of the M4 lineage. Army Ordnance began work on a follow-up tank. The T20 tank reached a mock-up stage in May , and was intended as an improved medium tank to follow the M4. Army had no doctrinal use for a heavy tank at the time. T20[ edit ] The T20 was designed to have a more compact hull than the M4.
The engine had originally been an effort by Ford to produce a V liquid-cooled aircraft engine patterned after the Rolls-Royce Merlin , but failed to earn any aircraft orders and so was adapted as a V-8 for use in tanks; use of this lower profile engine together with the choice of a rear transmission and rear sprocket drive layout made it possible to lower the hull silhouette and eliminate the side sponsons.
M4 sherman tank stock photos
Kit Article by Stephen Brezinski; last updated: Despite all the small-scale Sherman kits released several years ago by UM, Dragon, Extra Tech, Trumpeter and resin makers, I am thrilled that Heller has released this brand new Sherman, and made a really well detailed, quality model as well. This kit is a long way from the Heller kits of the s.
For those unfamiliar with the Sherman family, the M4 and M4A2 share welded hulls and they can be difficult to tell apart from the front or side. Having a diesel engine, actually two diesel engines, the M4A2 has a different engine deck and prominent muffler at the rear, along with other minor features.
Sherman M4 Firefly with pounder gun First appearing in January , the Firefly was a British modification of the Sherman that mounted an Ordnance quick-firing (QF) pounder (mm) gun in a heavily modified turret.
TBA Introduction The Firefly was originally intended as a stop-gap solution to a problem Allied tanks had with countering German vehicles with superior armour such as the Panthers and Tigers. British designs were on the drawing board, but were not envisaged to be ready for the Normandy landings. Even so, the creation of the Firefly, essentially consisting of mounting a 17 pounder gun to a Sherman tank was initially fought against by authorities.
Eventually this opposition was dropped, and various design changes, such as new and repositioned recoil cylinders, repositioned breech, redesigned gun barrel and rear armoured turret bustle led to the creation of a vehicle that was ready in time for the Normandy landings and proved itself invaluable. There were three main variants of the vehicle, based upon which variant of Sherman had been used, the 1c, 1c Hybrid and VC.
This kit from Dragon of the 1c has the characteristic welded angular hull, whilst the 1c hybrid had the more rounded cast hull.
A History: ’s Word of the Year
Changed the durability from 1, HP to 1, HP. Changed the research cost of the BL-9S gun from 44, to 24, Changed the research cost of the next vehicle in the branch—Object —from , to , Added the mm D-4S gun.
The main difference between the new tank, designated the M4 Sherman, was its upper hull, which deleted the sponson and featured a redesigned turret to accommodate the new gun.  .
Its usually people believing every myth about the T on the eastern front while also believing everything said about the Sherman in Belton Coopers Death Traps, which is largely responsible for the hatred towards the Sherman, especially when you have things like the History Channel using it as a source. Yesterday i had someone claiming that Sherman tankers jumped out of their tanks whenever they met a Panther or Tiger. Ever heard of Arracourt? I have however, done a lot of research on both of these tanks so lets see how facts compare to the myths.
This is going to be pretty long but paragraphing does wonders to making things easier to read. Shermans burned easily because of the gasoline engine and because of it, it gained nicknames like Tommy Cooker and Ronson. Gasoline engine had nothing to do with the fires on the Sherman because the British and Germans also used gasoline engines in their tanks yet they don’t have a reputation with fires. There are two reasons for the fires on the Sherman.
In North Africa, the British stored ammunition poorly in the Sherman, putting it pretty much everywhere it could fit. This meant that a penetrating hit was likely to hit the ammo rack. Later in the war, US had introduced wet ammo stowage for the Shermans. Any tank burns when you shoot it enough. So if you are in a Panzer or behind a PAK, the fact that the tank has been knocked out and the crew has left it does not mean that you should stop shooting.
No, what you want to do is prevent the enemy from recovering the tank and when the tank catches fire, its broken beyond repair.
Type 3 Chi-Nu
It compared very well against the Panther and could put the hurt on a Tiger should it be needed. It was additionally far superior to the Pz4 or Stug3 which were the most common armored vehicles it would have encountered in ww2. Much of the hate against the Sherman has been perpetrated post war and sadly most of it is from Belton Cooper.
Death Traps, a poorly written memoir by Belton Y. Cooper promises much, but delivers little.
Paraguay Brings Back Sherman Tanks. Paraguay is putting World War II-era M3 Stuarts and M4 Sherman tanks back into service. The country is thought to have three Sherman medium .
Phoenix Arizona The M-4 was definitely the superior of the two vehicles. It proved far more adaptable in good part due to the selection of a fairly large turret ring than the Pz IV. Gunwise, there isn’t much to choose between the two. That model could have been available shortly after D-Day had it been ordered into production. A turreted Pz IV lacked the capacity to accept a weapon that large. Of course, post war the Israelis managed to shoehorn a high velocity gun into it as well, not to mention the models used in WW II.
The Sherman has far better turret traverse, being both faster and smoother with better fine movement control. This ensured a good Sherman crew was going to get the first shot in more of the time.